Lastly, I'm sure some people on here are going to claim that I'm just some bitter Japanese person pretending to be a foreigner (as that would be par for the course based on my past experience on here), but no, I am actually a foreigner. I will just say that I'm from the "West" to keep it vague, but I did not start learning Japanese until I was an adult, so apologies for any weird verbiage in my comments above.
If you think that what I typed above (or even here) is incorrect, whether grammatically or in terms of spelling, please go ahead and specifically point out which parts are wrong. Don't spend too much time on it, though, because I can already tell you that you won't find any mistakes despite your posts above. サンキュー！
It’ just because you’ve been writing broken English that is obviously not from a native speaker.
Just an example. When referencing to a website you can say like “here on Mansion Community” or just “here” but we don’t say “on here”. It’s just weird.
Also, your source is unconvincing. For example, The Epoch Times is a fake news site backed by the cult Falun Gong, especially focusing on making fake news on China Communist Party. It is famous for conspiracy theories whatever can be used to attack the CCP or support Trump.
Just google it before referencing to any random news source.
1. It makes no sense pretending to be a foreigner.
2. A native English speaker don’t need to graduate from a top university or get a phd degree to proof his/her English is good. Every native speaker can write such simple sentences but you were just making grammatical errors.
3. Check your source before referencing to it. If it’s a fake news site, it just makes your arguments suspect.
1. It makes no sense pretending to be a foreigner.
2. A native English speaker don’t need to graduate from a top university or get a phd degree to proof his/her English is good. Every native speaker can write such simple sentences but you were just making grammatical errors.
3. Check your source before referencing to it. If it’s a fake news site, it just makes your arguments suspect
Literally the first word you wrote is wrong - it should be “it’s,” not “it’”. Next, “Just an example” is not a complete sentence and sounds weird; an actual native English speaker would say something like, “ just to give an example” or something like that. Also, native English speakers definitely say “on here” when posting on online message boards; it’s used all the time by native English speakers on Reddit and stuff too. Allow me to provide you just one of a countless number of examples that you could easily have confirmed yourself if you knew how to use Google:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bumble/comments/q4xubd/what_are_you_looking_f...
Lastly, I posed 3 sources - are you saying that the content thereof is incorrect? Attacking the source instead of the contents of something is a common logical fallacy. If you don’t think that places like Vancouver are having issues with certain foreigners driving up housing prices, I’d like to see sources backing up your position as the Canadian government has been taking actual measures to address these issues (as has been widely reported in the news).
Now you know that an English speaker can make typos like a missing s in “it’s” but won’t make grammatical errors like “on here”.
Also, you don’t have to always write complete sentences when writing social network posts. It’s not an academic paper or a news article. As a beginner in English you may always be writing complete sentences but in everyday talking and writing we don’t do so.
By the way I’m an American born and raised in Bellevue WA and graduated from UW. Ask me about the area if your are interested :)
Bruh, if you think that saying “on here” is incorrect English then I’m not sure there’s much point in continuing this convo. It’s legit just as much of a colloquial way of speaking as your usage of “Just an example” is. Nice try, though! lol
・ Directly connected to the station vs. not directly connected to the station
・Safe and secure seismic isolation vs. damping
・Clogs wearing commercial vs. no commercial
・Middle dwelling unit with LowE glass vs. middle dwelling unit without LowE glass
・Superior maximum ceiling height 2650 vs Superior maximum ceiling height 2550
・ Almost no trunk room vs. almost no trunk room
・Porch where two cars are lined up with plenty of room vs. Porch where one car is barely parallel parked
・No smoking area in the building vs. Smoking area in the building
・Partition plate Tall type vs Perabo for nutrients
・Door frame fittings matching vs door frame white color
・Average unit price per tsubo 425 vs Average unit price per tsubo 450 → 600 ☆Update!!
